Login
 
    
    Lost Password?  
Register

Sponsored Ads

Oscars 2008: Who SHOULD Win and Who WILL Win
Monday, 28 January 2008
That's right, it's Oscar season again. All the pageantry, all the pomp, all the sycophantic compliments and obviously rehearsed "off-the-cuff" acceptance speeches. All the inane Hollywood chatter and sub-sincere "you deserve it"s. An orgy of self-congratulatory celebration for the rich and famous.

So, I thought to myself, why not join in?

The list of nominated actors, actresses, and films was released last week on the official site (http://www.oscars.com/nominees/), and I've poured over them to bring you my choices for Best Actor, Best Actress, Best Film, and so on and so forth.

But that's not all! I've also done thorough research into the last 10 years of Academy Award winners to find the common patterns inherent in each category. Now, instead of only stating who we'd like to win, we can actually predict who will ACTUALLY walk away with the little golden statue at the end of the night.

Does it work? I guess we'll have to wait and see.

The Academy Award Nominations for 2008:


ACTOR IN A LEADING ROLE

Who SHOULD win:

Daniel Day-Lewis. He's no stranger to Oscar-worthy roles and is known for throwing himself into his roles. His character in There Will Be Blood is complex and fascinating to watch, the sign of a true actor.

Who WILL (probably) win:

The Academy loves a man in power or a celebrity biopic. Since we have neither this year, George Clooney is getting the most buzz, which leads me to believe it will limp away with the win.

George Clooney Michael Clayton
Daniel Day-Lewis There Will Be Blood
Johnny Depp Sweeney Todd:
The Demon Barber of Fleet Street
Tommy Lee Jones In the Valley of Elah
Viggo Mortensen Eastern Promises


ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE

Who SHOULD win:

Javier Bardem. If you've seen No Country for Old Men, then you know why. Bardem brings to life the quirkiest, scariest, funniest, most frightening antagonist in easily the last five years.

Who WILL (probably) win:

Javier Bardem. Seriously, go see the movie.

Casey Affleck The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford
Javier Bardem No Country for Old Men
Philip Seymour Hoffman Charlie Wilson's War
Hal Holbrook Into the Wild
Tom Wilkinson Michael Clayton


ACTRESS IN A LEADING ROLE

Who SHOULD win:

Ellen Page. Because Juno was by far the best picture I've seen this year, and it all hinges on the tiny Page in a role far beyond her character's years. Also, because I'm personally championing this movie this year.

Who WILL (probably) win:

The Academy usually goes with a historic figure, or a woman outside her typical gender role. Cate Blanchett will probably score big on this one, with her role as Britain's 3rd homeliest queen (2nd homeliest is Elton John).

Cate Blanchett Elizabeth: The Golden Age
Julie Christie Away From Her
Marion Cotillard La Vie En Rose
Laura Linney The Savages
Ellen Page Juno


ACTRESS IN A SUPPORTING ROLE

Who SHOULD win:

Amy Ryan. Don't let the fact that Ben Affleck wrote and directed this turn you off. It's surprisingly powerful and well performed.

Who WILL (probably) win:

After the many accusations of racism, the Oscars vehemently try to deny it by giving an award to any African-American nominated, which led to Halle Berry winning an Oscar (that's right, Halle "Swordfish-boobs" Berry has won an oscar). As much as I hate to say it, as the Oscars token black person this year, Ruby Dee looks like the smart call. I hope they prove me wrong.

Cate Blanchett I'm Not There
Ruby Dee American Gangster
Saoirse Ronan Atonement
Amy Ryan Gone Baby Gone
Tilda Swinton Michael Clayton


ANIMATED FEATURE FILM

Who SHOULD win:

Ratatouille. Brad Bird should win based on principle alone.

Who WILL (probably) win:

Ratatouille. Mainly because Persepolis was boring, and Surf's Up made me want to gouge my own eyes out in disgust.

Persepolis
Ratatouille
Surf's Up


ART DIRECTION

Who SHOULD win:

The Golden Compass. The contrasting styles and architecture of the two seperate worlds is a visual feat to behold.

Who WILL (probably) win:

There Will Be Blood. The Academy seems to veer towards unusual locations, but might overlook The Golden Compass due to the supposed "anti-christian" overtones. I'd say Sweeney Todd, but the Academy tends to avoid "dark" films for this category.

American Gangster
Atonement
The Golden Compass
Sweeney Todd:
The Demon Barber of Fleet Street
There Will Be Blood


CINEMATOGRAPHY

Who SHOULD win:

The Diving Bell and the Butterfly. Janusz Kaminski is a genius. Need proof?
Watch Saving Private Ryan again.

Who WILL (probably) win:

Unfortunately, it seems like the Academy doesn't know the difference between art direction and cinematography (as history shows). Whoever wins the art direction award usually wins the cinematography award by default.

The Assassination of Jesse James
by the Coward Robert Ford
Atonement
The Diving Bell and the Butterfly
No Country for Old Men
There Will Be Blood


COSTUME DESIGN

Who SHOULD win:

Sweeney Todd. It's a period piece, but with a vicious streak of style that the Academy may not reward.

Who WILL (probably) win:

In the past, the award usually locks in with the art direction and cinematography awards, defaulting to whatever "period piece" is out that year if the formerly mentioned movie happens to miss the nomination. By that reasoning, Elizabeth:The Golden Age looks like the shoo-in to win.

Across the Universe
Atonement
Elizabeth: The Golden Age
La Vie En Rose
Sweeney Todd:
The Demon Barber of Fleet Street


DIRECTING

Who SHOULD win:

No Country for Old Men. It's a Coen movie. 'Nuff said.

Who WILL (probably) win:

Put simply: a drama. That's just the way the Academy rolls. More specifically, they tend to be "heavy-hitting" modern day stories, which would put Michael Clayton in fair running for the coveted award.

Julian Schnabel The Diving Bell and the Butterfly
Jason Reitman Juno
Tony Gilroy Michael Clayton
Ethan & Joel Coen No Country for Old Men
Paul Thomas Anderson There Will Be Blood


BEST PICTURE

Who SHOULD win:

Juno. Beautiful, poignant, witty, sophisticated, heart-warming. It's got the goods.

Who WILL (probably) win:

In yet another example of duality between awards, whatever movie wins the Best Direction Oscar usually goes on to win the Best Picture Oscar. It's usually a modern-day drama, so both Michael Clayton and No Country for Old Men have a shot.

Atonement
Juno
Michael Clayton
No Country for Old Men
There Will Be Blood


VISUAL EFFECTS

Who SHOULD win:

None.The Golden Compass was well executed but unoriginal, Pirates was well designed but poorly executed, and Transformers was poorly designed but well executed.

Who WILL (probably) win:

I dunno. Transformers? Maybe robots beat pirates and polar bears.
The Golden Compass
Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End
Transformers


WRITING (ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY)

Who SHOULD win:

Diablo Cody for Juno. Watching this movie made me want to read everything she's ever written. That, my friends, is talent.

Who WILL (probably) win:

Strangely enough, Diablo Cody for Juno. The Academy tends to veer towards unusual or quirky material when voting for an original screenplay, and harder hitting material for the adapted screenplays (which I'm not commenting on, because they are just editing someone elses story, which feels like cheating to me). Lars and the Real Girl also fills this category, but I have a strong feeling the Academy will go with the more socio-political of the two.

Diablo Cody Juno
Nancy Oliver Lars and the Real Girl
Tony Gilroy Michael Clayton
Brad Bird,
Jim Capobianco,
Emily Cook,
Kathy Greenberg,
Bob Peterson,
and Jan Pinkava
Ratatouille
Tamara Jenkins The Savages


So there you go: my in-depth analysis of the upcoming 80th Academy Awards. Check back on Monday, February 25th for a review of the winners.

Agree with my choices? Want to slap some sense into me? Post a comment below and let us know!

Comments (10)
Tron wrote...
Nice post pete, I've been meaning to weigh in with my Lost theory but i've been very busy of late so I'll have to do that when I get some spare time and also after i've re-read your universe imploding mind-fuck of a theory again.

I'm in agreement with most of these (Juno....what can i say) but a) how could you not pick No Country for best cinematography - that was stunningly well shot - almost beats Road to Perdition for my mind, b) Blanchette for best supp actress - not because I'm patriotic but she honestly sold me as Dylan even after I had convinced myself it couldn't be done and c) I know you hate it but c'mon Transformers is hands down the best VFX lighting, compositing and animation to date for a live action film. period. Childhood detroyed by Michael Bayhem or not.

I guess only time will tell if ALL your theories are as accurate as your Lost and Heroes ones are.

Oh and kudos for the FF > IE banner (It appeers in my RSS reader). Has a web designer it's something i've always wanted to include on every site I make and I'm glad somebody did.
|| January 29, 2008
Peter wrote...
Thanks, Tron! I really liked the cinematography in No Country for Old Men, and if Diving Bell wasn't up there it would be my choice hands down. Cate Blanchett was great, but when is she not? I just felt that Amy Ryan had the greatest accomplishment of the selections: you really, really, really hate her character at the end of the movie, but it's completely unintentional. She does a great job of playing the worst mother in history. And, well... I think I've made it known where I stand on the Transformers. It was excellently executed and the CGI was top-notch... it just wasn't designed very well.

As a funny sidenote, I almost thought about closing the site off from IE users completely so that I wouldn't have to code everything twice, but decided the extra effort was worth being cross-browser compatible. Supposedly, IE 8 is standards-compliant, but we'll see on that.
http://www.bleepinggeek.com || January 29, 2008
Tom wrote...
Very good post. Nicely organized and good summaries. I heard this morning on the radio the Oscars may not even go. Would they have a news broadcast format like with the Golden Globes? What are your thoughts on the Golden Globes while we're at it? Anyhow, I am intrigued by many of your comments. I've yet to see Juno, but I *love* Ellen Page - in a nice way - and I am looking forward to seeing it. I also have to see "No Country..."

|| January 29, 2008
Peter wrote...
Tom - From everything I've heard and read, the Academy Awards is actually one of the main reasons the WGA and AMPTP are again aggressively pursuing a resolution to the strike. Neither side wants a repeat of the Golden Globes.

Honestly, I think they should put on the Oscars without writers. Do you know who writes all those lame, poorly conceived, hacky jokes that the celebs spit out with the bare minimum of enthusiasm?

This guy:
http://i1.tinypic.com/mwuq2h.jpg

They should get a real comedian to host it, and let him make the jokes and leave it at that. Sure, you won't get to see Rhianna chumming around with Luke Wilson like they're best friends at a slumber party, but c'mon. Does anyone actually believe that all these celebrities and stars really get along that well? They don't.

I also love Ellen Page, but not in the nice way. Haha!
http://www.bleepinggeek.com || January 29, 2008
manzy704 wrote...
I agree with almost all of your picks but I believe There Will Be Blood shall win Best Picture. The Academy has almost always ignored comedies in this category (I was pleasantly surprised that Juno got a nod) and Michael Clayton didn't have the buzz the Academy likes around a Best Picture pick.

No Country For Old Men is my personal pick for Best Picture of the year and probably stands the best chance of upsetting my prediction. Look for this film (NCFOM) to win for Best Adapted Screenplay as well.
|| January 29, 2008
Peter wrote...
Manzy704- thanks for the comment! I really liked There Will Be Blood as well (hence my choice for Lewis in the Best Actor category). I chose Juno because I'd really like to see it win, and the "who will probably win" prediction was based on the last 10 years worth of winners, which ended up being predominately based in the late 20th century and/or British in origin (the exceptions were Gladiator in 2000, and Chicago in 2002).

And if I had reviewed the adapted screenplay category, NCFOM would have gotten my pick, hands down.
http://www.bleepinggeek.com || January 29, 2008
Cinemoose wrote...
Nice post. However, disagreed on most of your who will win picks. There's a formula that's been pretty accurate for picking Oscar winners. I lay it all out here:

http://cinemoose.com/guide-to-handicapping-the-oscars/
http://cinemoose.com || February 02, 2008
Peter wrote...
Cinemoose - that's an excellent read, and does bring up some good points. Glad to see a fellow screenwriter's opinion!
http://www.bleepinggeek.com || February 02, 2008
Nick wrote...
Some great points, but I disagree with nearly every one of your who will win choices. My choices for winners include:

Best Picture: No Country for Old Men (saw this one this week, definately deserving)
Best Actor: Daniel Day-Lewis
Best Actress: Julie Christie
Best Supp. Actor: Javier Bardem
Best Supp. Actress: Amy Ryan
Best Directing: Joel & Ethan Coen
Best Animated Film: Ratatouille (a personal favorite)
Cinematography: There Will Be Blood
Original Screenplay: Juno
Adapted Screenplay: No Country for Old Men
Costume Design: Atonement
Visual Effects: Transformers
|| February 20, 2008
Peter wrote...
That's OK, Nick - I disagree with most of the "who will win"s as well, they're just based on previous winners in the category. Statistics are hardly ever accurate anyway, especially when it involves a voting process.

You've got some great picks there (most are the same as my personal picks - the "who should win"s), and I would love to see the Coens take home an Oscar, I'm just worried that the Academy will snub them this year.
http://www.bleepinggeek.com || February 21, 2008

Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
busy
 
Copyright © 2005 - 2012 Bleeping Geek.com.